Saturday, April 6, 2019

Call to Action: No on 2345 - Restricting Local Zoning Authority

As you may be aware from our Legislative Blog postings, we have followed closely SB2345 that would modify some of the zoning and siting requirements for “animal feeding operations”. At the direction of our Legislative Committee, we had not engaged in the debate, as it was felt that some of the requests for greater certainty were reasonable, and the stakeholders had worked with everyone to advance changes that did not directly diminish local land use control. The changes primarily dealt with timely decision-making.
The bill was amended this week in the House Committee, and many of these changes were also reasonable. However, the elimination of the local zoning authorities’ (counties’ and townships’) ability to modify setbacks by 50% was viewed by our legislative committee (many of them producers themselves) as unacceptable. After meeting today, they unanimously directed that we now oppose the bill.
As this bill is on Monday’s HOUSE floor calendar, we are asking our membership to contact their Representatives urging a NO vote. The link to each House member’s email address can be found below – although don’t hesitate to talk to them personally if you see them this weekend.
Please communicate your own thoughts, but ask that they “VOTE NO (RED) on SB2345 to preserve reasonable local zoning control.”

1 comment:

  1. I’m a small farmer in ND and I’m concerned about Senate Bill S2345. It appears the sponsors of the bill want to severely limit local zoning authority. The language in this bill should be a concern for anyone not interested in building a concentrated feeding operation. For example: “A board of county commissioners may not preclude the development of animal feeding operation in the county.” and “A board of county commissioners may not prohibit the reasonable diversification or expansion of a farming or ranching operation.” The word “preclude” means there is no reason the county can limit or prohibit development of concentrated feeding operations, and the term “reasonable” is subjective to the different definitions by individuals or special interest groups. As a small property owner, I’m very concerned about what will happen to my property values if I’m in the shadow of a concentrated animal feeding operation. I trust a local zoning authority to make better judgements for what is fair for both commercial feed lot developers, and the property owners who will be affected by these projects. My vote is for local zoning authority. S2345 is a bad idea and should not become law. S2345 is so tainted with bad intentions no revision of it should become law.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Blog Archive